State v. M.M.
Facts of the Case:
The State alleged that our client crashed into another vehicle while driving under the influence. Our client blew a 0.00 on the breathalyzer, so our attorneys knew the State’s ability to prove the case would hinge on a pending urinalysis test, and immediately demanded a speedy trial. With the trial approaching, and the urinalysis results still pending, the State decided it could not win at trial and dismissed the charge.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different and depends on its unique facts. Statistics reflect cases handled by attorneys at Aaron Delgado & Associates and are not a prediction of the outcome of any future case.
Case Result:
Charge dismissed.
